Portfolio

Information Architecture for a Collaborative B2B Platform

Year
2020
Duration
3 months
Client
B2B Platform (confidential)
Role
UX Research · Information Architecture · Facilitation
  • UX Research
  • Information Architecture
  • Facilitation
6 Workshops
20+ Participants
12 Partner Companies
20 Tree Test Participants

A subscription platform for distributors and their manufacturer partners – cooperatively organised, with many equal voices. The challenge was not only to structure a complex product world at macro and micro level, but to guide stakeholders with partly opposing visions towards a shared outcome.

Phase 01

Preparation

Understanding the problem space, stakeholder mapping, workshop design

Phase 02

Book Cover Workshops

6 sessions with over 20 participants from a dozen companies. Clustering the product world at macro and micro level, prioritising information hierarchically.

Phase 03

Synthesis

Consolidating workshop results, deriving information architecture, navigation structure and page structure.

Phase 04

Tree Test

Developing scenarios and tasks together with stakeholders. 20 participants testing the structure for findability and comprehensibility.

Phase 05

Validation & Handover

Evaluating results, deriving implications for the architecture, presenting to stakeholders, finalising structure.

Card Sorting

Grouping content and products through the eyes of users – without predefined categories.

Book Cover Method

Spine = eye-catcher. Cover = indispensable essence. Back cover = overview. Making priorities tangible without remaining abstract.

Tree Test

Testing the finished structure against mental models – can you find what you are looking for, and where do you expect it?

Stakeholder Facilitation

Guiding divergent perspectives from a dozen companies into a shared process – and ultimately to an outcome that everyone can stand behind.

Outcome

An information architecture, navigation structure and page structure that convinced stakeholders and users alike. And a process in which all participants felt heard – which is by no means a given in a cooperative context.